TOP LATEST FIVE CASE LAWS FOR THE BAIL OF SECTION 506 PPC URBAN NEWS

Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news

Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

As the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made clear that police is free to choose action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities matter to law. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-field duties from the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it suitable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Most of the volumes (which includes more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are also obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment may depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[7]

The legislation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.

The regulation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called legislation of necessity..

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, case management programs for law firms there might be 1 or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for your decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted in an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Report this page